I was not a Windows fan, being used to Unix/Linux and only using command line interfaces on DOS screens in windows. A few years of administering Windows server systems has bought me round to the view that both environments have positives.
Windows Vista has been getting a lot of bad press, and many companies have held off updating from a stable XP operating system. Now Windows 7 (gone are the snappy names) is now on the horizon, but will this improve the windows desktop experience?
Vista has had troubles, not because it doesn’t work, but because it works too well. What it tried to do was cut out all the ‘patches’ that existed in previous versions of the desktop system. You know the situation, BloggsVideo brings out a new release of driver for it’s new graphics card and the older windows software can deal with the flaky code or bad memory management. Stick this onto Vista which says code MUST work and memory garbage collection must run according to the agreed standards. Suddenly BloggsVideo can’t run on any PC upgraded to Vista.
It is not down to Windows, this is down to BloggsVideo not delivering drivers and code to standard.
So the question is will Windows 7 return to the old days where sub-standard products will be able to run, thus bringing back the bloat code and horrible problems encountered when fault finding - how many times have support staff drop head into hands and wailed the line “It should work now” when it clearly doesn’t. The reason, it should have but something in the interface hasn’t exactly matched, is it the OS or the product?
Having heard the wailings from our other office, not to say the exasperation eminating from my own at times I would have been a lot happier with a tighter more controlled OS. My worry is that we may slip back to the popularist world of bodges and patches that have plagued Windows from the start.
It’s time to be true to yourself Microsoft.
